Uploaded by mscheng
The more I read about leadership the more I think people are describing a utopian view of leadership rather than what great leaders really do. First, the only think that really defines a leader is someone who has followers. If you don’t have a least one follower you really are much of a leader.
So would the most effective leaders be the ones with the greatest number of followers? Perhaps but you might also want to factor in the amount a fanaticism in the legions of followers.
Ghandi, Ghengis Kahn, William Wallace, George Washington, Pope Alexander and L. Ron Hubbard all had legions of fanatic followers. What did they all have in common? The only think I can think of is the ability to sell their vision to others. I think you’ll also see them leading from out in front.
The interesting thing is that the vision itself actually doesn’t really matter as long as you can sell it. So leadership skills and principles can work for good or negative ends. In fact, good intentions can often lead to the biggest disasters. As they say, “the road to hell is paved with good intentions.”