I ran across this video that questions that validity of Learning Styles. What struck me is that it focuses the research on learning information which is most of what happens in schools. I would like to see the same analysis done on learning how to do things which is what business focuses on. I welcome your comments.
Archive for August, 2009
Do Learning Styles Exist?
Posted in Learning, tagged Education, Human Resources, Learning, Learning Styles, training on August 31, 2009| Leave a Comment »
Dairy Queen and Call Centers
Posted in Learning, tagged Agents, Call Centers, Education, Learning, Service on August 27, 2009| 1 Comment »
So what do Call Centers and Dairy Queen have in common?
I remember when I was much younger you’d make frequent trips to Dairy Queen in the summer. What you’d find is that they’d hired lots of high school kids. They’d all be able to make a basic cone but that’s about it. However, there was always one kid who knew how to make everything. So if you ordered the super banana split, you’d have to wait for the one expert.
In any call center there is always someone who knows how to do everything. It’s not necessarily a supervisor. So if you don’t like the answers you’re getting, my advice is to hang up and redial until you find that individual. If you ask for a supervisor and you don’t get a good answer, redial and see if you can get a different supervisor. I recently did this with Sprint. After about 5 frustrating calls, I got an agent who knew the issue and how to handle it. Plus the agent saw from my bill where I was wasting money and made some changes. So if you’re frustrated by a call center call, think Dairy Queen.
Getting More Out of Linkedin
Posted in Learning, tagged Education, Human Resources, Learning, Learning Paths, linkedin, training on August 26, 2009| 2 Comments »
I think you need to start by thinking about Linkedin as a longer term networking tool. You’re not going to generate dozens of consulting opportunities in the first week. However, over time you can meet hundreds or even thousands of people who share like interests.
You also have the advantage of being able to confine your activity to those who have the profile of those you want to talk to. Here are some quick ideas.
1. There are more than 3000 groups. Try to find those with the most members, the most flexible rules and the most active. Since you only have 50 at a time, you’ll need to join and unjoin until you get the right 50.
2. Become visible. Start good discussions and comment on others. If you find a good discussion topic, consider repeating it in other groups.
3. Offer something free that the group will value. A webinar, whitepaper, etc.
4. Start your own group and then ask everyone you come in contact with to join. Make sure you are putting up good content in your group. You can join my group by searching on Learning Paths.
Do you start with a financial business case with new initiatives?
Posted in Learning, tagged business case, Human Resources, Learning, six sigma, talent management, training on August 25, 2009| Leave a Comment »
One of the challenges of measuring effectiveness is trying to build the evaluation as a last step. This is especially true of training. It actually works really well. It follows the model used in six sigma. We often use a business case that looks at the potential return on investment for reducing time to proficiency. We try to show that every day employees aren’t fully productive has a direct financial impact in terms of productivity, safety, quality, etc. Then the initiative looks at what would be the gains for reducing time to proficiency by say 30%. It’s turns out to be a lot of money
A Thought on Bloom’s Taxonomy
Posted in Learning, tagged Education, Human Resources, Learning, talent management on August 22, 2009| Leave a Comment »
Bloom Taxonomy has been very popular for more than 50 years concern levels of cognition. It helps write objectives from simple..recall to complex..evaluation. Works well in school systems where knowledge is king. However, in the world where doing is more important than knowing..the corporate world, a different paradigm is needed.
I recommending replacing objectives with definitions of desired results in terms of quantity, quality and time.. or how good, how much, how fast. For example, being able to get the right answer on the job is only good if you can do it quickly, spontaneously or on the spot.
Twitter for Training?
Posted in Learning, tagged Education, Learning, training, twitter on August 21, 2009| 1 Comment »
Have you considered how you might use Twitter for training? You could do tips of the day, word of the day or something clever of the day. You might want all participants to post a journal entry as they practice after a class. It might also be a place to ask the class a quick question.
I’m not sure how useful it would be because I haven’t tried it. But if you use cell phones it might be a good thumb workout.
Knowing doesn’t equal doing
Posted in Learning, tagged Education, Human Resources, Learning, talent management on August 15, 2009| Leave a Comment »
One of the problems most people have with traditional education is that it focuses on knowing. However, knowing how to do something is a long way from being able to do it.
For example, you can know how to throw a hundred mile an hour fastball but it doesn’t mean you can do it.
So as you look at your next training, consider if all your objectives are about knowing and then change them to doing objectives. It makes you training very different.
7 Ways to Capture and Transfer Organizational Knowledge and Skills Before It’s Too Late
Posted in Learning, tagged downsizing, Education, Learning, mergers, organizational knowledge, Outsourcing, Quality, strategy, talent, talent management, training on August 14, 2009| Leave a Comment »
- What impact will “organizational amnesia” have on your business in the coming years?
- How much does it cost when valuable knowledge and skills gained through years of experience leave you company forever?
- How will your customers and results be affected when everyone who is intimately familiar with critical internally-developed technologies and processes has left the organization and there’s little or no documentation to explain them?
- What is your organization doing to retain and transfer essential expertise when the workers who possess it are no longer on your payroll?
If an aging workforce, downsizing, mergers or other business conditions have you thinking about questions like these, this one-day seminar is for you. It provides a proven, practical methodology to distill the expertise you want to retain and create a critical path for developing it far more quickly and reliably than through conventional training.
In this seminar, you will learn how to:
- Create proficiency statements which define the desired expertise in observable and measurable terms
- Establish leading indicators that show the desired expertise is being transferred or gained at an acceptable rate
- Identify “quick hits” to accelerate the expertise replication process quickly and at little or no cost
- Dramatically increase the consistency, reliability, and quality of your current process for transferring knowledge and skills
- Structure on-the-job and informal aspects of developing the expertise to save time, reduce costs, and increase effectiveness
- Identify and capture “hidden” best practices
- Sustain your expertise transfer initiative so it becomes part of how your organization does business
Who Should Attend
This seminar is for senior executives, business unit heads, operations executives, HR and training staffs as well as anyone involved in workforce planning, mergers, outsourcing and quality improvement.
Investment
This seminar is presented on an in-house basis for groups of five to 50 participants. The cost is $3,000 plus $195 per participant for materials. Travel costs are additional and reimbursed at actual.
About Learning Paths
Using Learning Paths, GE and many other leading companies have applied proven quality and process improvement methods to the learning process for more than 400 different positions staffed by over 30,000 people in seven countries. In every case, results included: 30% or greater reduction in time to proficiency, substantial cost savings, and improved return per FTE.
For more information on how to bring this seminar to your organization contact:
Ira Kasdan
Performance Builders, Inc.
952-401-1016
ira@buildperformance.com