True and false, multiple choice, fill in the blank, matching and even essay tests for the most part evaluate knowledge and comprehension. They’re easy to write. Easy to score and easy to compare one student to another.
However, knowing and doing are two very different things. That’s why there is often very little correlation between how employees do on classroom tests and how they perform on the job. Unless you’re training academics, there needs to be a more meaningful way to do testing.
It’s actually fairly easy. You ask an expert to watch the student work or perform a required task. That expert will be able to tell you a lot about what that student knows and doesn’t know. Most experts tell me they’d know in less than five minutes.
You can then ask the expert what he or she is looking at. What are the key inidicators? Now you have a good evaluation checklist that you can use to train others on this type of evaluation.
This type of evaluation doesn’t favor those who are “good test takers.” It also tests the links between a range of tasks and knowledge.
Unfortunately, this type of test isn’t very easy with elearning unless you can do some very sophisticated simulations.
Here’s a reading test that any school system can use that is guaranteed to be better than what they use today. Give a student a book. Say, okay read it to me. After five minutes, ask, “what did you just read?” Any good teacher will know where this student is on their reading ability. You also won’t get anyone through high school who fakes their way through without learning to read.
Read Full Post »