June 20, 2009 by Steve Rosenbaum
We’re doing free webinars every other Friday. Here is the write up on our next one. Go to Learningpathsinternational.com if you want to register.
A Learning Paths Webinar!
Why Your Training Doesn’t Work & How to Fix It
Friday June 26th at 2:00 PM Central
Click to Register!
Your organization believes in training and invests in it. You recognize that developing your people is “the right thing to do”. Yet despite putting precious resources into an array of conventional solutions like competency studies, classroom training, e-learning programs, mentor or buddy assignments, and certification systems, your company is experiencing one or more of the following:
- There’s uncertainty about the value and ROI that current training programs and initiatives are delivering
- Too many workers including long-term employees are not performing at the desired level
- Workers leave classes insufficiently prepared to do their jobs creating a drag on productivity, quality, and morale
- Classes and training time are getting longer, but performance isn’t getting better
- The time it takes to learn some critical jobs is long, longer than it could and should be
- Workers who are a poor fit or aren’t measuring up are identified too late, after the time and money invested in them are considerable
In this webinar you will learn:
- How to measure the return on your training investment in a way that is powerful, practical, and immediately meaningful to senior executives
- How to create a learning culture that focuses on speed and delivering business results for your organization
- How to raise the proficiency levels in those positions that are most important to your company’s success
- How to accelerate the learning process and cut the time it takes people to get up-to-speed in their jobs by 30% or more
- How to spot and eliminate waste and inefficiency in the learning process
This webinar will introduce you to the Learning Path Methodology and explain how you can apply it to quickly deliver significant savings and help your organization prosper in these challenging times.
Using the Learning Path Methodology, GE and many other leading companies have applied proven quality and process improvement methods to the learning process for more than 400 different positions staffed by over 30,000 people in seven countries. In every case, results included: 30% or greater reduction in time to proficiency, substantial cost savings, and improved return per FTE.
Friday June 26th at 2:00 PM Central
Click to Register!
Learning Paths International
1373 White Oak Drive
Chaska, MN 55318
www.learningpathsinternational.com
Posted in Learning | Leave a Comment »
June 8, 2009 by Steve Rosenbaum

This is actually white stuff from the trees. It was everywhere and looked like snow. Snow in June. The ice age is comming. Really freaked out the dogs.
Posted in Learning | Tagged Dog, ice age, Learning, snow, summer | Leave a Comment »
March 23, 2009 by Steve Rosenbaum
This is the start of a series of posts about how Learning Paths apply when you don’t have a lot of new hires. It’s a similar process with different goals. I’m open to your ideas on the topic and to discuss similar thoughts. First post will be Tuesday.
Posted in Learning | Tagged Education, Human Resources, Learning, Learning Paths, training | 2 Comments »
December 17, 2008 by Steve Rosenbaum
Well it’s time for puppy school. He seems to like recess the best. He didn’t do his homework. I had to use the excuse that he ate his own homework.
It’s interesting to see the different ways people train dogs. A lot of behaviorism, but there’s also a lot of treating them the way other dogs treat each other. It’s sort of Pavlov meets the dog whisperer. I let everyone now if he finally gets his PH.D. in rolling over.

Posted in Behaviorism, Change Management, Education | Tagged Dogs, Learning, puppy, school, training | 3 Comments »
December 14, 2008 by Steve Rosenbaum
Just continuing to look at the different ways people measure training. Measuring behavioral change isn’t a bad one. If you really know what to do look for, you should start to see changes being made after training. Often creating behavioral checklists and doing direct observation is a popular way of measuring at level 3.
Here are the pitfalls. First, when you divide things into behaviors you can loose how they work together. You can do all the new behaviors but miss all the connections. More than likely, participants begin to get better at these behaviors but haven’t yet reached a level of proficiency or mastery. That takes a lot of time, practice and feedback.
Look at the example of learning to do great presentations. You can train to a set of new behaviors in front of others during a presentation. You can then look to see if those behaviors are starting to appear. You should see some change. This is a good thing. However, to continue on to a higher level of proficiency won’t happen immediately. In fact, the new behaviors can quickly dissappear under the pressure of doing things for real.
The solution is to look at how you can continue to build those behaviors and work on all the subtleties that may not be on the checklist.
Posted in Behaviorism, Business, Change Management, Education, Human Resources, Instructional Design, Learning | Tagged behavioral change, Education, instruction, Learning, level 3, measurement, training | Leave a Comment »
December 13, 2008 by Steve Rosenbaum

Uploaded on February 16, 2008 by Hyperscholar
In education and training we spend a lot of time and effort testing for knowledge. Some of it is even around application of knowledge. But here’s the rub. Knowing and doing are two very different things. I think it goes with the comment, if you’re so smart why aren’t you rich?
We see it all the time we’re someone does good on the test and poorly on the job and vice versa. Many people think this is all about test anxiety. In reality, it’s because of the major difference between knowing and doing.
Also knowledge tests are rarely about speed and fluency. In the classroom you have time to answer questions, on the job you need to respond quickly.
So two suggestions. If you need to do knowledge tests, put a fast time limit on it so it mirrors the pace of the job. Second, dump the knowledge tests and replace them with expert on the job observation.
Posted in Learning | Tagged evaluation, Knowledge, Learning, level 2, skills, Testing | 2 Comments »
December 12, 2008 by Steve Rosenbaum

by FernandoLins.com
This is a very popular discussion question. It goes along with how do you actually measure training. This is the first of a series of posts on the topic. In this posts, I want to talk about the evaluation sheets that are passed out after every seminar, lecture or course. It includes questions such as:
- How did you like the workshop?
- Did you get anything out of it?
- How did the instructor do?
- Did you like the lunch?
It’s a lot like a customer satisfaction survey. It’s never a bad idea to ask customers what they think.
However, I think the value of these evaluations is very limited. Just liking something doesn’t necessarily lead to learning, skill building or real change. This evaluation really won’t tell you if anything will have a lasting effect a day, a week or a month later. Here’s an example,
One of the training programs that always gets great reviews is style training. Style training comes in lots of different varieties and people like them. Everyone likes to here good things about themselves. However, being able to actually use this information to do anything significant on the job seldom happens. In fact, it’s more likely to be misused.
So, the point is..it’s nice to have happy participants. Much better than unhappy participants. However, don’t confuse happiness with learning.
Posted in Business, Consultative Sales, Education, Human Resources, Instructional Design, Learning | Tagged assessment, evaluation, level 1, training | 4 Comments »
December 11, 2008 by Steve Rosenbaum

Uploaded on June 12, 2005
by Hysterical Bertha
If you were to create a scorecard for senior executives relating to training, what would you put on it? Let’s make it harder and limit you to five or less items. Remember if it’s on the scorecard it needs to be measurable.
Posted in Business, Change Management, Education, Human Resources, Learning | Tagged Education, Learning, measurement, scorecard, training | 1 Comment »
October 10, 2008 by Steve Rosenbaum
One of the short falls of today’s education and training is that is built on old ideas and an older way of doing things. I’d like to put out the question. If you could start with a clean slate and design education any way you wanted what would it look like?
Posted in Accelerated Learning, Business, Education, Human Resources, Instructional Design, Learning | Tagged Business, Education, Learning, school, training | 5 Comments »
October 7, 2008 by Steve Rosenbaum
When you look at developing proficiencies or for that matter competencies, you don’t get good at everything all at once. Sometimes items are weeks, months or even years apart. What this allows you do to is set milestone dates for each proficiency. So it might take 18 months to achieve all proficiencies, some of them happen in the first week, others happen in the first month and others might take a year.
When you have these milestones in place, you can then added them to periodic assessments that cover all proficiencies that should be completed by that date. We’ve been putting in a lot of 3, 6, and 9 month reviews and then focusing on what needs to be demonstrated by those dates.
Posted in Learning | Tagged book, Business, Competencies, Education, HR, Learning, training | 1 Comment »
Older Posts »